Lawyers in Islamabad

Present:  Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, J. MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN--Petitioner versus CHAIRMAN ARBITRATION COUNCIL DISTRICT COURT,  ISLAMABAD , etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 470 of 2017, decided on 29.12.2017. Constitution of  Pakistan , 1973-- ----Art. 199--Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961, Ss. 7(3) & 8--Pronouncement of  talaq --Delegated right of  talaq , Exercise of--Certificate of effectiveness of  talaq  not issued by Chairman Arbitration Council--Failure of reconciliation proceedings--Dismissal of application filed by petitioner--Daughter of petitioner was married to private respondent, had been delegated right of divorce in Column 18 of  Nikah Nama , which she exercised and consequently filed application before Chairman Arbitration Council for effectiveness of Divorce--Chairman dismissing application--Challenge to--Petitioner contended that after expiry of 90 days from  talaq , it was incumbent upon Chairman to issue certificate ...

---Ss. 195 (1) (a) (b) & 561-A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 199 & 200 – Quashing of proceedings – Application for ---Direct complaint against applicants on allegation that applicants had sworn false affidavits --- Court issued process against the applicants for an offence punishable under Ss. 199 & 200, P. P. C. ---Under mandatory provisions of S. 195 (1) (a) (b), Cr. P. C., in offences punishable under Ss. 199 & 200, P. P. C., no cognizance could be taken by any Court except upon complaint in writing of such Court where said offences were committed or some other Courts to which such Court was subordinate – Private person had no authority to file a complaint in view of provisions of S. 195 (1) (a) (b), Cr. P. C. --- Court to which private complaint was filed having no jurisdiction to take cognizance on such complaint, proceedings before said Court being abuse of process of Court, same were quashed, in circumstances. For  more , you can consult omara.khan789...

Plaintiff is the person that files a case while defendant is a person against whom a case is filed. There can be multiple plaintiffs and multiple defendants in a case. A suit against multiple defendants is a civil case in which there are number of persons against whom relief is sought. In such like circumstances the plaintiff has to serve summons to all the defendants separately. Even if different defendants in a case have same address, the plaintiff has to serve them summons separately. Each defendant has to right to defend himself separately in the case. Case proceeding can be different against different defendants depending upon the relief sought in the plaint. For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

There are only few Airlines Operating from Pakistan. These include Pakistan International Airline (PIA), Bhoja Air, Shaheen Air, Serene Air and Air Blue. Similarly there have been only 4-5 Airline accidents reported in 71 years history of Pakistan. The first aircraft of PIA was crashed in the Himalayas in 1989. After that the second incident was reported of Airblue Air Crash in 2010 in the Margalla Hills. In 2012 another plane of Bhoja Air crashed near Islamabad Airport. The last accident happened in 2016 when another PIA aircraft fell near Haripur on the way back from Chitral. Initially there was no law developed for compensation in such like incidents. However, since Pakistan was signatory to Montreal Convention, a prominent lawyer Mr. Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra) from Islamabad dragged Airblue in litigation after the Airblue Aircrash in 2010. The case resulted in compensation of an amount equal to 55,00,000 Rupees. Later in 2012 a law was enacted and compensation was settled as ...