Skip to main content

The Best Aviation Lawyer in Islamabad

There are only few Airlines Operating from Pakistan. These include Pakistan International Airline (PIA), Bhoja Air, Shaheen Air, Serene Air and Air Blue. Similarly there have been only 4-5 Airline accidents reported in 71 years history of Pakistan.

The first aircraft of PIA was crashed in the Himalayas in 1989. After that the second incident was reported of Airblue Air Crash in 2010 in the Margalla Hills. In 2012 another plane of Bhoja Air crashed near Islamabad Airport. The last accident happened in 2016 when another PIA aircraft fell near Haripur on the way back from Chitral.

Initially there was no law developed for compensation in such like incidents. However, since Pakistan was signatory to Montreal Convention, a prominent lawyer Mr. Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra) from Islamabad dragged Airblue in litigation after the Airblue Aircrash in 2010. The case resulted in compensation of an amount equal to 55,00,000 Rupees.

Later in 2012 a law was enacted and compensation was settled as 50,00,000 Rupees in that law. In the Bhoja Air incident and in the recent Air crash of PIA, the compensation was made by the same law.

The best aviation lawyer in Islamabad is Mr. Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra). He has pleaded number of cases in the field of aviation. He can be approached at lawyergolra@gmail.com or at +92-333-5339880..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

  PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:   Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest   misappropriation   of   entrusted   property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...

Co-sharer

Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278.  For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

Prosecution should be afforded fair opportunity of trial

  PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 42 [Balochistan High Court, Quetta] Present:  Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Rozi Khan Barrech, JJ. Dr.  MUHAMMAD ARIF--Appellant versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 3 others--Respondents Crl. Acq. A. No. 461 of 2019, decided on 21.12.2020. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 265-K, 249-A & 417(2)--Jurisdiction u/S. 265-K, Cr.P.C.--Exercise of powers--Appeal against acquittal--The object of exercise of powers is to prevent abuse of law available to learned trial Court under sections 265-K and 249-A of Cr.P.C., however, in a case where sufficient, prima facie, evidence is available, powers may not be exercised as to throttle process of justice--The primary consideration to be kept in view would be whether continuance of proceedings before could be a futile exercise, wastage of time and abuse of process of Court or not--If on basis of facts admitted and a patent on record no offence can be made out, then it would amount to abuse of proc...