Skip to main content

Conviction on Retracted Confession

Image
By
1992 SCMR 1983
2020 PcrLJ 311 Sindh
Accused can be convicted on retracted confession,
must be to state the truth; assistance for which can be ascertained from
(I) whether the confession appears truthful within the context of the prosecution case
(ii) whether there is any other evidence on record which tends to corroborate the truthfulness of conference.

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan 
Criminal Lawyer
+92-333-5339880

Comments

  1. Mavens And Co30 December 2021 at 11:43

    I kept on wondering what would emerge if these folks could all see each other's ideas)
    customs lawyers

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The right to life and dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education

By
PLJ 2018 Lahore 646 (FB) Present :  Abid Aziz Sheikh, Shams Mehmood Mirza and Shahid Karim, JJ. CITY SCHOOL PRIVATE LIMITED--Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 29724 of 2015, decided on 5.4.2018. Constitution of  Pakistan , 1973-- ----Arts. 9, 14, 18, 25-A, 37(b) 38(d)-- Punjab  Private Educational Institutions (Promotion and Regulations Ordinance, 1984 and Rules, 1984, R. 7-A--Amendment--Restructions were imposed--Fee increased for any academic year for not more than 5% and 8% retrospective effect--Question of--Whether amendment regarding fixation and determination fee of private schools which as claimed by Government is ensure not to allow commercialization, profiteering and expatition--Right to education--The right to life and dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education--Principles of policy--Right to education is also guaranteed under Arts. 37(b) & 38(d)--Principles...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women Rights Judgment on Article 25(3) of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973

By
  PLJ 1990 SC 346  [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:  MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH CJ AND RUSTAM S. SlDHWA J  Mst.  FATAL JAN-Petitioner versus ROSHAN DIN and 2 others-Respondents  Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 9-R of 1990, allowed on 24.4.1990 [On appeal from judgment dated 18.12.1989, of Peshawar High Court, Circuit  Bench Abbottabad, in Civil Revision No. 89 of 1985]  (i) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- —-Art. 25(3)-Women-Protection of-Fundamental right of-Petitioner who  appeared in person, is apparently incapable of conducting this complicated  case herself-It is in interest of justice that she should be provided with  assistance of competent experienced civil lawyer in pursuance of fundamental  right contained in Article 25 clause (3)~Held: Protection under this Article does not only mean protection of body but also rights—Held further: Rights include property rights.     [P.349JC (ii) Inheritance- —Inhe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Order of Wafaqi Mohtasib accepting grievance petition

By
  PLJ 2003  Peshawar  336 (DB) Present :  SHAHZAD AKBAR KHAN AND QAZI EHSANULLAH QURESHI, JJ. PAKISTAN  RAILWAYS through DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT  PAKISTAN  RAILWAYS, PESHAWAR-Petitioner versus SAID MUHAMMAD and 2 others-Respondents W.P. No. 863 of 2000, decided on 14.4.2003. ( i ) Establishment of the Office of  Wafaqi   Mohtasib  (Ombudsman)  Order (1 of 1983)-- —-S. 32-Order of  Wafaqi   Mohtasib  accepting grievance petition of  respondent (employee) and holding him entitled to ' full  pension/commutation on the post, assailed—Respondent having been  retired from service on 27.8.1997, could not have been reverted to his  substantive post on 26.3.1998, after about 7 months of his retirement- Petitioner failed to prefer representation before President in terms of  . S. 32 of the Order (1 of 1983) and thus, did not avail remedy provided by  law-Another colleague of respondent who in sim...
Post a Comment
Read more