Skip to main content

Will

By

1)      Will in favour of heir not valid unless consented by other heirs after death. NLR 1995 SCJ 679; PLJ 1996 SC 1087; 1999 SCMR 971.
2)      Unregistered will cannot create any right in favour of heir unless it is acted upon. NLR 1999 Civ 611. Shia law 1/3 income of property allowed to be deposited in profitable scheme till deceased of case. 2007 MLD 165.
3)      Bequeath would be void for want of assent of all legal heirs after the death of testator. 1997 CLC 2012.
4)      Once it was found that will was revoked, property distributed among heirs. 2001 CLC 1323. Oral will. 2735.
5)      Oral evidence that deed of revocation of will was cancelled not accepted. NLR 1997 Ac 767. Execution of will accepted, not interfered. 2004 SCJ 474.
6)      Will may or may not be in writing and may or may not be attested by witnesses. PLJ 1997 Lah. 255.
7)      A will cannot be made in favour of heir unless consented to after death. NLR 2000 CLJ 709. Scribe and stamp vendor not produced, will not prove. 2008 YLR 589.
 Bequest of more than 1/3rd cannot take effect unless all heirs’ consent to it after death. 2002 CLC 808. Forged will. 2004 SCMR 513.
8)      Will made by deceased in favour of non-heir would be effective even without consent of heirs of deceased. 2002 SCMR 1330.
Oral will in favour of driver admitted by legal heirs, mutation attested accordingly. 2007 SCMR 794.
9)      Bequest to one heir not valid unless other heirs consent. PLD 2003 Quetta 53.
Will deed have executed without consent of legal heirs not valid? 2008 CLC 47.

10)  Will, marzulmaut. 2003 MLD 185.

For more, you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

By
  PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:   Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest   misappropriation   of   entrusted   property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Co-sharer

By
Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278.  For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Post a Comment
Read more

Prosecution should be afforded fair opportunity of trial

By
  PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 42 [Balochistan High Court, Quetta] Present:  Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Rozi Khan Barrech, JJ. Dr.  MUHAMMAD ARIF--Appellant versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 3 others--Respondents Crl. Acq. A. No. 461 of 2019, decided on 21.12.2020. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 265-K, 249-A & 417(2)--Jurisdiction u/S. 265-K, Cr.P.C.--Exercise of powers--Appeal against acquittal--The object of exercise of powers is to prevent abuse of law available to learned trial Court under sections 265-K and 249-A of Cr.P.C., however, in a case where sufficient, prima facie, evidence is available, powers may not be exercised as to throttle process of justice--The primary consideration to be kept in view would be whether continuance of proceedings before could be a futile exercise, wastage of time and abuse of process of Court or not--If on basis of facts admitted and a patent on record no offence can be made out, then it would amount to abuse of proc...
Post a Comment
Read more