NAB Inquiry Notice

When a person receives a notice from NAB to appear in an inquiry, it can be for two purposes:-

1. An inquiry is opened against alleged corruption of such person by the institution of National Accountability Bureau, or

2. A person's statement is required in the inquiry opened against a third person with whom such person has ever transacted

In both scenarios the persons summoned by NAB are required to appear before the concerned Investigation officer. NAB generally opens up an inquiry on the applications received by credible sources to investigate a matter.

A lawyer cannot plead the case of his client at the departmental inquiry stage. However he can be consulted for best course of action to be adopted at such stage.

For more, you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

Comments

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...

Co-sharer

Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278. For more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

Prosecution should be afforded fair opportunity of trial

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 42 [Balochistan High Court, Quetta] Present: Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Rozi Khan Barrech, JJ. Dr. MUHAMMAD ARIF--Appellant versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 3 others--Respondents Crl. Acq. A. No. 461 of 2019, decided on 21.12.2020. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 265-K, 249-A & 417(2)--Jurisdiction u/S. 265-K, Cr.P.C.--Exercise of powers--Appeal against acquittal--The object of exercise of powers is to prevent abuse of law available to learned trial Court under sections 265-K and 249-A of Cr.P.C., however, in a case where sufficient, prima facie, evidence is available, powers may not be exercised as to throttle process of justice--The primary consideration to be kept in view would be whether continuance of proceedings before could be a futile exercise, wastage of time and abuse of process of Court or not--If on basis of facts admitted and a patent on record no offence can be made out, then it would amount to abuse of proc...

Lawyers in Islamabad

Search This Blog