Skip to main content

Custom


1.       Transaction of gift made by widow prior to 15-3-48 would stand protected on basis of PLD 1985 SC 407. Land inherited under custom before 15-3-48 by vendor/ donor would be deemed to have been inherited under Muslim Shariat Law and person inheriting the same would be absolute owner. 1998 CLC 41.
Custom abrogated. NLR 2007 Civ. 449.
2.       Mutation under custom, daughter debarred from inheritance, no limitation in such a case, daughter given 1/3rd of inheritance. 2002 CLC 2001.
3.       Wajib-ul-Arz of 3 villages where disputed property is situated clearly mentioned that deceased being 5 years was governed by Muslim Personal Law, very strong evidence is required to rebut oral evidence. Insufficient for custom. PLJ 1997 Lah. 1183; custom not proved, distributed according to Muslim Law. 2002 CLC 1539.


Section 2A protected past and closed transaction if possession is delivered under transaction. If one of the two conditions are missing the judgement would be void and in executable. NLR 2007 Civ. 449

For more, you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Co-sharer

Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278.  For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

When an application for restoration of suit is allowed, all interim orders passed prior to dismissal of suit for non-prosecution, stand revived

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 276 Present :  Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J. M/s. PANTHER DEVELOPERS--Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE (ADJ), WEST, ISLAMABAD and 2 others--Respondents W.P. No. 977 of 2018, decided on 10.4.2018. Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance, 2001 (IV of 2001)-- ----S. 17(9)--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199--Execution of lease agreement--Default in payment of rent--Violation of terms and Conditions--Eviction Petition--Dismissed for non prosecution--Application for restoration--Allowed--Tentative order--Struck off right of defence--Eviction Petition allowed--Appeal was dismissed--Determination--Direction to--It is well settled that when a suit is dismissed for non-prosecution, and an application for restoration is filed, Court/Tribunal can, while said application is pending, pass interim orders--It is also well settled that when an application for restoration of suit is allowed, all interim orders passed prior to dismissal of suit for non...

2013 S C M R 587

Rule that no limitation ran against a void order was not an inflexible rule --- Party could not sleep over to challenge a void order and it was bound to challenge the same within the stipulated/Prescribed time period of limitation from the date of knowledge before the proper forum in appropriate proceedings --- Appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was admittedly time-barred, and was rightly dismissed as being hit by limitation and no sufficient cause for condonation of delay was found --- High Court agreed with the order of Appellate Tribunal --- Supreme Court had affirmed concurrent findings recorded by fora below --- Review petition was dismissed in circumstances. For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006