Skip to main content

Cross Examination of Accused is not mandatory in a Criminal Case

By
If an accused does not like to submit any documents or if he is not willing to give statement under section 340(2) of CRPC, he cannot be cross examined. A person is only cross examined when he given statement on oath.

Generally in a criminal trial, the accused gives statement under section 342 of CRPC. That statement is basically answers to the questions asked by the judge at the end of trial. If the accused answers such questions without furnishing any documents or without giving any statement on oath, he cannot be cross examined.


For more, you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Co-sharer

By
Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278.  For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Post a Comment
Read more

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

By
  PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:   Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest   misappropriation   of   entrusted   property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scope of Quashment Petition in Azad Jammu & Kashmir

By
PLJ 2021 AJ&K 33 [Shariat Appellate Bench] Present:  Raja Sajjad Ahmad Khan, J. SAQIB HUSSAIN and another--Petitioners versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, DHIRKOT and 2 others--Respondents Misc. Crl. P. No. 132 of 2019, decided on 9.7.2020. AJ&K Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Act, 1985-- ----S. 16-2(L)--"Public place" means a street, road, thoroughfare, park, garden or other place to which the public have free access and includes a hotel, restaurant, motel, mess and club, but does include the residential room of a hotel in the occupation of some person."                                                                      ...
Post a Comment
Read more