Skip to main content

2007 P Cr. L J 613

By

Provision of S. 195 (1) (c), Cr. P. C. had prevented a litigant in a civil matter from lodging a criminal complaint regarding alleged manipulation of documents which were the subject-matter of said proceedings--- Had it not been so then every litigant who had filed a civil proceeding based upon certain documents, would be exposed to criminal prosecution by the other side who had challenged the genuineness of such documents --- Law had provided that such a complaint could only be lodged by the Concerned Court, only after it would come to the conclusion that the document in question was forged --- Bar contained in S. 195 (1) (c), Cr. P. C., would apply to the cases of tampering with the record of a Court as well as to the cases of previously forged documents used as genuine in the Court proceedings. 

For more, you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

By
  PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:   Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest   misappropriation   of   entrusted   property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Prosecution should be afforded fair opportunity of trial

By
  PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 42 [Balochistan High Court, Quetta] Present:  Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Rozi Khan Barrech, JJ. Dr.  MUHAMMAD ARIF--Appellant versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 3 others--Respondents Crl. Acq. A. No. 461 of 2019, decided on 21.12.2020. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 265-K, 249-A & 417(2)--Jurisdiction u/S. 265-K, Cr.P.C.--Exercise of powers--Appeal against acquittal--The object of exercise of powers is to prevent abuse of law available to learned trial Court under sections 265-K and 249-A of Cr.P.C., however, in a case where sufficient, prima facie, evidence is available, powers may not be exercised as to throttle process of justice--The primary consideration to be kept in view would be whether continuance of proceedings before could be a futile exercise, wastage of time and abuse of process of Court or not--If on basis of facts admitted and a patent on record no offence can be made out, then it would amount to abuse of proc...
Post a Comment
Read more

While granting pre-arrest bail, merits of case can be touched upon by Court and question of further inquiry can also be stretched at this stage

By
  PLJ 2026 Cr.C. (Note) 119 [Lahore High Court, Lahore] Present: Muhammad Amjad Rafiq, J. MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ--Petitioner versus STATE etc.--Respondents Crl. Misc. No. 42260-B of 2025, decided on 17.9.2025. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 498--Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F--Pre-arrest, bail, grant of--Allegation of--Dishonoured of cheque--Trial Court after recording of evidence--Petitioner has paid Rs. 20,00,000/- to complainant during proceeding in pending petition before lower Court which fact squarely makes his case that of further inquiry and question of further inquiry can be looked into even at pre-arrest bail stage--Granted pre-arrest bail to accused therein not only on grounds of mala fide , ulterior motives and abuse of process of law, but also on ground of further inquiry--While granting pre-arrest bail, merits of case can be touched upon by Court and question of further inquiry can also be stretched at this stage as well--Apparently pet...
Post a Comment
Read more