Skip to main content

NGO registration is no more easy

Image
By
There are four statutes that govern the NGO registration procedures in Pakistan.

1. The Societies Registration Act 1860
2. The Trusts Act 1882
3. The Volunteer Social Welfare Agency Act 1961
4. The Companies Act 2017

Out of these four statutes ban has been imposed on first three procedures. The fourth one is now the official procedure which takes long time for registration. Similarly if a person starts complying with the requirements of the Companies Act 2017, it is not necessary that the NGO may be registered even after a year's struggle.

It seems that the Government of Pakistan is no more encouraging the process of NGO registration. Therefore the new entrants in the NGO industry almost have no scope. However, if you like to register a NGO for fair purposes then with some struggle its registration is possible. You can contact lawyergolra@gmail.com for NGO registration.

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra)
NGO Lawyer
+92-333-5339880

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The right to life and dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education

By
PLJ 2018 Lahore 646 (FB) Present :  Abid Aziz Sheikh, Shams Mehmood Mirza and Shahid Karim, JJ. CITY SCHOOL PRIVATE LIMITED--Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 29724 of 2015, decided on 5.4.2018. Constitution of  Pakistan , 1973-- ----Arts. 9, 14, 18, 25-A, 37(b) 38(d)-- Punjab  Private Educational Institutions (Promotion and Regulations Ordinance, 1984 and Rules, 1984, R. 7-A--Amendment--Restructions were imposed--Fee increased for any academic year for not more than 5% and 8% retrospective effect--Question of--Whether amendment regarding fixation and determination fee of private schools which as claimed by Government is ensure not to allow commercialization, profiteering and expatition--Right to education--The right to life and dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education--Principles of policy--Right to education is also guaranteed under Arts. 37(b) & 38(d)--Principles...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women Rights Judgment on Article 25(3) of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973

By
  PLJ 1990 SC 346  [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:  MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH CJ AND RUSTAM S. SlDHWA J  Mst.  FATAL JAN-Petitioner versus ROSHAN DIN and 2 others-Respondents  Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 9-R of 1990, allowed on 24.4.1990 [On appeal from judgment dated 18.12.1989, of Peshawar High Court, Circuit  Bench Abbottabad, in Civil Revision No. 89 of 1985]  (i) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- —-Art. 25(3)-Women-Protection of-Fundamental right of-Petitioner who  appeared in person, is apparently incapable of conducting this complicated  case herself-It is in interest of justice that she should be provided with  assistance of competent experienced civil lawyer in pursuance of fundamental  right contained in Article 25 clause (3)~Held: Protection under this Article does not only mean protection of body but also rights—Held further: Rights include property rights.     [P.349JC (ii) Inheritance- —Inhe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Order of Wafaqi Mohtasib accepting grievance petition

By
  PLJ 2003  Peshawar  336 (DB) Present :  SHAHZAD AKBAR KHAN AND QAZI EHSANULLAH QURESHI, JJ. PAKISTAN  RAILWAYS through DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT  PAKISTAN  RAILWAYS, PESHAWAR-Petitioner versus SAID MUHAMMAD and 2 others-Respondents W.P. No. 863 of 2000, decided on 14.4.2003. ( i ) Establishment of the Office of  Wafaqi   Mohtasib  (Ombudsman)  Order (1 of 1983)-- —-S. 32-Order of  Wafaqi   Mohtasib  accepting grievance petition of  respondent (employee) and holding him entitled to ' full  pension/commutation on the post, assailed—Respondent having been  retired from service on 27.8.1997, could not have been reverted to his  substantive post on 26.3.1998, after about 7 months of his retirement- Petitioner failed to prefer representation before President in terms of  . S. 32 of the Order (1 of 1983) and thus, did not avail remedy provided by  law-Another colleague of respondent who in sim...
Post a Comment
Read more