Ground of Impotency should not be taken in a Khula Case

Even if the man is impotent and wife wants to take khula from him, this ground should not be taken in the case. The reason is that if the wife takes this ground as a ground of Khula, the Family Judge has powers to grant time to the husband to prove that he is not impotent.

A husband can be given time of 1 year to prove that he is not impotent. In such like circumstances the case lingers on for no just reasons. So it is always advisable not to take the ground of impotency in the case.

The best way to obtain khula decree in shortest possible times is to take the ground of hatred because the hateful union cannot continue as per the dictums laid down by the superior courts of Pakistan.

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra)
International Family Lawyer
+92-333-5339880

Comments

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...

Co-sharer

Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278. For more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006

Prosecution should be afforded fair opportunity of trial

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 42 [Balochistan High Court, Quetta] Present: Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Rozi Khan Barrech, JJ. Dr. MUHAMMAD ARIF--Appellant versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 3 others--Respondents Crl. Acq. A. No. 461 of 2019, decided on 21.12.2020. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 265-K, 249-A & 417(2)--Jurisdiction u/S. 265-K, Cr.P.C.--Exercise of powers--Appeal against acquittal--The object of exercise of powers is to prevent abuse of law available to learned trial Court under sections 265-K and 249-A of Cr.P.C., however, in a case where sufficient, prima facie, evidence is available, powers may not be exercised as to throttle process of justice--The primary consideration to be kept in view would be whether continuance of proceedings before could be a futile exercise, wastage of time and abuse of process of Court or not--If on basis of facts admitted and a patent on record no offence can be made out, then it would amount to abuse of proc...

Lawyers in Islamabad

Search This Blog