Skip to main content

Islamabad District Courts

Image
By
District Court is the highest court in a district as per the provisions of Civil Procedure Code 1908. Similar for criminal justice systems the Sessions Court has the same stature. In Islamabad like most districts, the District Judges have the powers of Sessions Judges also.

Islamabad was divided into two districts few years ago i.e. Islamabad East and Islamabad West. For that reason Islamabad has two District and Sessions Judges. Similarly each District and Sessions Judge has around 5 Additional District and Sessions Judges working under them. There are further 2 senior civil judges, along with several Family Judges, Civil Judges, Magistrates and Rent Controllers working under them.

Islamabad District Courts are located in the region of Sector F-8 of Islamabad. There are around 4000 Lawyers having around 2000 offices in the premises of Islamabad District Courts. Similarly the High Court of Islamabad is located in Sector G-10 with having around 7 Judges including the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court.

For more you can consult lawyergolra@gmail.com

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra)
Advocate High Court
+92-333-5339880I



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Co-sharer

By
Possession of one co-sharer in possession of all . 1998 MLD 857, 1857; 2006 YLR 831; 2008 SCMR 661, 616; 2008 SCMR 905. Co-sharer to establish right of co-heirship . 2008 MLD 278.  For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Post a Comment
Read more

2013 S C M R 587

By
Rule that no limitation ran against a void order was not an inflexible rule --- Party could not sleep over to challenge a void order and it was bound to challenge the same within the stipulated/Prescribed time period of limitation from the date of knowledge before the proper forum in appropriate proceedings --- Appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was admittedly time-barred, and was rightly dismissed as being hit by limitation and no sufficient cause for condonation of delay was found --- High Court agreed with the order of Appellate Tribunal --- Supreme Court had affirmed concurrent findings recorded by fora below --- Review petition was dismissed in circumstances. For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006
Post a Comment
Read more

Entrustment of property and dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property

By
  PLJ 2026 SC 96 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:   Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, JJ. AYESHA TAYYAB--Petitioner versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CANTT.DISTRICT SIALKOT, etc.--Respondents C.P. No. 1575 of 2024, decided on 22.5.2025. (On appeal against the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1684 of 2024) Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 406--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199(1)(a)(ii)--Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), S. 561-A--Quashment of criminal proceedings and Quashment of FIR--Entrustment of property and dishonest   misappropriation   of   entrusted   property--“Qarz-e-Hasna”--Amount was handed over as a loan/trust--High Court observed that no offence under section 406 PPC was made out from contents of FIR and proceeded to quash same under its constitutional jurisdiction conferred by Article 199--Contents of FIR determine whether a cogni...
Post a Comment
Read more