Skip to main content

Structure of Judiciary in Islamabad

Islamabad comprises of two districts namely; Islamabad East and Islamabad West. Both districts are headed by one District and Session Judge each. Similarly there are few Additional Session & District Judges in each District. There are also around five senior civil judges Islamabad working under both districts.

There are separate courts of Family Judges, Magistrates, Civil Judges and Rent Controllers in Islamabad. All the captioned courts are located in the premises of District Courts in Sector F-8 Islamabad.

Apart from the above captioned courts, there are special courts in Islamabad. There is a judicial complex in sector G-11, Islamabad whereby the Banking Court, Drug Court, Insurance Tribunal, Accountability Court, Customs Tribunal and other special courts are located. Also the office of Islamabad Bar Council is located within the same Judicial Complex.

The High Court of Islamabad is located in Sector G-10 Islamabad. It is constitutional court working under the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Islamabad High Court is also heading the entire judiciary of Islamabad.

The labor court of Islamabad is located in Sector F-5. The Federal Shariat Court is in its neighbourhood. Across the road is Supreme Court of Pakistan. Similarly the Services Tribunal of Islamabad is also located in the same vicinity.

Islamabad has 50 Union Councils and 1 Arbitration Council. The Deputy Commissioner office of Islamabad is located in sector G-11, Islamabad. Administration Officers like Assistant Commissioners and Registrars of few departments are also located in the same vicinity of Deputy Commissioner Office.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The right to life and dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education

PLJ 2018 Lahore 646 (FB) Present :  Abid Aziz Sheikh, Shams Mehmood Mirza and Shahid Karim, JJ. CITY SCHOOL PRIVATE LIMITED--Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 29724 of 2015, decided on 5.4.2018. Constitution of  Pakistan , 1973-- ----Arts. 9, 14, 18, 25-A, 37(b) 38(d)-- Punjab  Private Educational Institutions (Promotion and Regulations Ordinance, 1984 and Rules, 1984, R. 7-A--Amendment--Restructions were imposed--Fee increased for any academic year for not more than 5% and 8% retrospective effect--Question of--Whether amendment regarding fixation and determination fee of private schools which as claimed by Government is ensure not to allow commercialization, profiteering and expatition--Right to education--The right to life and dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education--Principles of policy--Right to education is also guaranteed under Arts. 37(b) & 38(d)--Principles...

Women Rights Judgment on Article 25(3) of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973

  PLJ 1990 SC 346  [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present:  MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH CJ AND RUSTAM S. SlDHWA J  Mst.  FATAL JAN-Petitioner versus ROSHAN DIN and 2 others-Respondents  Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 9-R of 1990, allowed on 24.4.1990 [On appeal from judgment dated 18.12.1989, of Peshawar High Court, Circuit  Bench Abbottabad, in Civil Revision No. 89 of 1985]  (i) Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- —-Art. 25(3)-Women-Protection of-Fundamental right of-Petitioner who  appeared in person, is apparently incapable of conducting this complicated  case herself-It is in interest of justice that she should be provided with  assistance of competent experienced civil lawyer in pursuance of fundamental  right contained in Article 25 clause (3)~Held: Protection under this Article does not only mean protection of body but also rights—Held further: Rights include property rights.     [P.349JC (ii) Inheritance- —Inhe...

Order of Wafaqi Mohtasib accepting grievance petition

  PLJ 2003  Peshawar  336 (DB) Present :  SHAHZAD AKBAR KHAN AND QAZI EHSANULLAH QURESHI, JJ. PAKISTAN  RAILWAYS through DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT  PAKISTAN  RAILWAYS, PESHAWAR-Petitioner versus SAID MUHAMMAD and 2 others-Respondents W.P. No. 863 of 2000, decided on 14.4.2003. ( i ) Establishment of the Office of  Wafaqi   Mohtasib  (Ombudsman)  Order (1 of 1983)-- —-S. 32-Order of  Wafaqi   Mohtasib  accepting grievance petition of  respondent (employee) and holding him entitled to ' full  pension/commutation on the post, assailed—Respondent having been  retired from service on 27.8.1997, could not have been reverted to his  substantive post on 26.3.1998, after about 7 months of his retirement- Petitioner failed to prefer representation before President in terms of  . S. 32 of the Order (1 of 1983) and thus, did not avail remedy provided by  law-Another colleague of respondent who in sim...