Skip to main content

Structure of Judiciary in Islamabad

Islamabad comprises of two districts namely; Islamabad East and Islamabad West. Both districts are headed by one District and Session Judge each. Similarly there are few Additional Session & District Judges in each District. There are also around five senior civil judges Islamabad working under both districts.

There are separate courts of Family Judges, Magistrates, Civil Judges and Rent Controllers in Islamabad. All the captioned courts are located in the premises of District Courts in Sector F-8 Islamabad.

Apart from the above captioned courts, there are special courts in Islamabad. There is a judicial complex in sector G-11, Islamabad whereby the Banking Court, Drug Court, Insurance Tribunal, Accountability Court, Customs Tribunal and other special courts are located. Also the office of Islamabad Bar Council is located within the same Judicial Complex.

The High Court of Islamabad is located in Sector G-10 Islamabad. It is constitutional court working under the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Islamabad High Court is also heading the entire judiciary of Islamabad.

The labor court of Islamabad is located in Sector F-5. The Federal Shariat Court is in its neighbourhood. Across the road is Supreme Court of Pakistan. Similarly the Services Tribunal of Islamabad is also located in the same vicinity.

Islamabad has 50 Union Councils and 1 Arbitration Council. The Deputy Commissioner office of Islamabad is located in sector G-11, Islamabad. Administration Officers like Assistant Commissioners and Registrars of few departments are also located in the same vicinity of Deputy Commissioner Office.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When an application for restoration of suit is allowed, all interim orders passed prior to dismissal of suit for non-prosecution, stand revived

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 276 Present :  Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, J. M/s. PANTHER DEVELOPERS--Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE (ADJ), WEST, ISLAMABAD and 2 others--Respondents W.P. No. 977 of 2018, decided on 10.4.2018. Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance, 2001 (IV of 2001)-- ----S. 17(9)--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199--Execution of lease agreement--Default in payment of rent--Violation of terms and Conditions--Eviction Petition--Dismissed for non prosecution--Application for restoration--Allowed--Tentative order--Struck off right of defence--Eviction Petition allowed--Appeal was dismissed--Determination--Direction to--It is well settled that when a suit is dismissed for non-prosecution, and an application for restoration is filed, Court/Tribunal can, while said application is pending, pass interim orders--It is also well settled that when an application for restoration of suit is allowed, all interim orders passed prior to dismissal of suit for non...

Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005

PLJ 2018 Lahore 868 [Multan Bench, Multan] Present :  Mujahid Mustaqeem Ahmed, J. MUHAMMAD AMIN--Appellant versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR--Respondent F.A.O. No. 130 of 2016, heard on 5.10.2017. Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005-- ----Ss. 19, 28 & 33--Seed Act, 1976, Ss. 22-B, 22-C, 22-E, 22-D & 23--Purchasing of hybird seed substandard quantity--Issuance of legal notice--Complaint before district consumer Court--Partly allowed--Suffering of Fiscal loss and mental agony--Question of--Whether purchased seed was hybird or substandard--Direction to--Respondent was under legal obligation to get his crop inspected from Obriculturist, Agriculture Officer or any expert of Research Center to obtain expert report/lab report of plants to corroborate his version--Laboratory tests and analysis of such experts are quite helpful   to   determine controversial   issue,   involved in such like cases--It is manifest that a detailed and effective procedure has b...

2013 S C M R 587

Rule that no limitation ran against a void order was not an inflexible rule --- Party could not sleep over to challenge a void order and it was bound to challenge the same within the stipulated/Prescribed time period of limitation from the date of knowledge before the proper forum in appropriate proceedings --- Appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was admittedly time-barred, and was rightly dismissed as being hit by limitation and no sufficient cause for condonation of delay was found --- High Court agreed with the order of Appellate Tribunal --- Supreme Court had affirmed concurrent findings recorded by fora below --- Review petition was dismissed in circumstances. For  more , you can consult omara.khan789@gmail.com or call +923123450006