Skip to main content

Child Custody Lawyer in Islamabad

For most people the welfare of child is of paramount importance. Often it happens that the minor children suffer because of family disputes between husband and wife and their families. In such circumstances parties approach the guardian courts and contest cases for the guardianship and custody of minor children.


The best relief in such like circumstances is a good lawyer at hand. Because only a competent lawyer and properly advice how to fight the case properly under the law.

One of the best child custody lawyer in Islamabad is Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra). His family is in the legal profession for almost a century. He has almost ten years experience being a Family lawyer and in this time period he has dealt thousands of cases effectively.

Mr. Salman Yousaf Khan is renowned not only in Pakistan but also internationally for his expertise in the child custody cases. His legal opinions have been regarded in the international courts as well. He can be approached at lawyergolra@gmail.com or at +92-333-5339880..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Proceedings before Wafaqi Mohtasib and President of Pakistan did not constitute Civil Proceedings

  PLJ 1999  Karachi  587 Present:  RAStfEED A.  RAZVI,  J.  SHIFAATULLAH QURESHI-Plaintiff Versus FEDERATION OF  PAKISTAN  through SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, 'RAILWAYS, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAILWAY BOARD), ISLAMABAD- Defendant  Suit No. 192 of 1992, decided on 20.3.1998.   Limitation Act, 1908-- —-S. 14 Arts. 56 & 115-Limitation~Question of--Plaintiff after dismissal of  his claim for recovery of amount of damage by defendant, instead of filing  suit approached  Wafaqai Mohtasib  who accepting claim of plaintiff  directed defendant to pay amount of damage to plaintiff-President of  Pakistan, on appeal, set aside order of  Wafaqi Mohtasib-Plaintiff  filed  suit for damages and permanent injunction after about 3 years and 10  months from dismissal of his claim by defendants-Plaintiff claimed that  period spent in proceeding before  Wafaqi Mohtasib  should have been  excluded-Held :~Period consumed during proceedings before  Wafaqi  Mohtasib  or before President of Pakistan could not be

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 316

PLJ 2018  Islamabad  316 Present :  Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, J. Mulana  ALLAH WASAYA and others--Petitioners versus FEDERATION OF  PAKISTAN  through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice etc.--Respondents W.P. Nos. 3862, 3847, 3896 and 4093 of 2017, heard on 9.3.2018. Constitution of  Pakistan , 1973-- ----Art. 199--Election Act, 2017, Scope-- General Election Order, 2002, Ss. 7(b) & 7(c)--Constitutional petition--Amendment in Election Act, 2017 relating to Qadiani group--Restriction on posting of Qadiani group for Constitutional posts--Contentions--Conversation of religion from Islam to Qadianiat--Separate data of NADRA relating to Qadiani in civil service--Inquiry report--Rabwa administration--Aqida-e-Khatm-e-Nubawat--Necessary measures for revival of all previous provisions relating to Qadiani group/Lahori group--Qadiani, seeks record of individuals/officers belonging to Qadiani, omitting provision of Ss. 7(b) and 7(c) of conduct of General Election Order, 2002, dec

Appointment and Recruitment in a Public Sector Company

  PLJ 2017 Islamabad 101 Present :  Shaukat  Aziz  Siddiqui , J. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION (PIAC)--Petitioner versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 2808 of 2013, decided on 18.11.2016. Wafaqi   Mohtasib  (Ombudsman) Order, 1983-- ----Arts. 9 & 29--General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 24-A--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199--Constitutional petition--Mal-administration--Order of ombudsman--Post of management trainee officer--Recruitment--Offer letters were issued--No vested right for appointment   in   service--Provincial   quota--Jurisdiction--Question   of--Whether ombudsman while recording findings fell in error or not--Determination--Ombudsman could have exercised jurisdiction, if any allegation of mal-administration was made; therefore, complainant should have been rejected on that score alone--President issued direction to accommodate complainant in next available training--Decision on representation is not based on finding of mal-administr