Islamabad District Courts

District Court is the highest court in a district as per the provisions of Civil Procedure Code 1908. Similar for criminal justice systems the Sessions Court has the same stature. In Islamabad like most districts, the District Judges have the powers of Sessions Judges also.

Islamabad was divided into two districts few years ago i.e. Islamabad East and Islamabad West. For that reason Islamabad has two District and Sessions Judges. Similarly each District and Sessions Judge has around 5 Additional District and Sessions Judges working under them. There are further 2 senior civil judges, along with several Family Judges, Civil Judges, Magistrates and Rent Controllers working under them.

Islamabad District Courts are located in the region of Sector F-8 of Islamabad. There are around 4000 Lawyers having around 2000 offices in the premises of Islamabad District Courts. Similarly the High Court of Islamabad is located in Sector G-10 with having around 7 Judges including the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court.

For more you can consult lawyergolra@gmail.com

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra)
Advocate High Court
+92-333-5339880I

Comments

Proceedings before Wafaqi Mohtasib and President of Pakistan did not constitute Civil Proceedings

PLJ 1999 Karachi 587 Present: RAStfEED A. RAZVI, J. SHIFAATULLAH QURESHI-Plaintiff Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, 'RAILWAYS, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAILWAY BOARD), ISLAMABAD- Defendant Suit No. 192 of 1992, decided on 20.3.1998. Limitation Act, 1908-- —-S. 14 Arts. 56 & 115-Limitation~Question of--Plaintiff after dismissal of his claim for recovery of amount of damage by defendant, instead of filing suit approached Wafaqai Mohtasib who accepting claim of plaintiff directed defendant to pay amount of damage to plaintiff-President of Pakistan, on appeal, set aside order of Wafaqi Mohtasib-Plaintiff filed suit for damages and permanent injunction after about 3 years and 10 months from dismissal of his claim by defendants-Plaintiff claimed that period spent in proceeding before Wafaqi Mohtasib should have been excluded-Held :~Period consumed during proceedings before Wafaqi Mohtasib or before President of Pakistan could not be

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 316

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 316 Present : Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, J. Mulana ALLAH WASAYA and others--Petitioners versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice etc.--Respondents W.P. Nos. 3862, 3847, 3896 and 4093 of 2017, heard on 9.3.2018. Constitution of Pakistan , 1973-- ----Art. 199--Election Act, 2017, Scope-- General Election Order, 2002, Ss. 7(b) & 7(c)--Constitutional petition--Amendment in Election Act, 2017 relating to Qadiani group--Restriction on posting of Qadiani group for Constitutional posts--Contentions--Conversation of religion from Islam to Qadianiat--Separate data of NADRA relating to Qadiani in civil service--Inquiry report--Rabwa administration--Aqida-e-Khatm-e-Nubawat--Necessary measures for revival of all previous provisions relating to Qadiani group/Lahori group--Qadiani, seeks record of individuals/officers belonging to Qadiani, omitting provision of Ss. 7(b) and 7(c) of conduct of General Election Order, 2002, dec

Appointment and Recruitment in a Public Sector Company

PLJ 2017 Islamabad 101 Present : Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui , J. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION (PIAC)--Petitioner versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 2808 of 2013, decided on 18.11.2016. Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983-- ----Arts. 9 & 29--General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 24-A--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199--Constitutional petition--Mal-administration--Order of ombudsman--Post of management trainee officer--Recruitment--Offer letters were issued--No vested right for appointment in service--Provincial quota--Jurisdiction--Question of--Whether ombudsman while recording findings fell in error or not--Determination--Ombudsman could have exercised jurisdiction, if any allegation of mal-administration was made; therefore, complainant should have been rejected on that score alone--President issued direction to accommodate complainant in next available training--Decision on representation is not based on finding of mal-administr

Lawyers in Islamabad

Search This Blog