Skip to main content

Returning of Dowry Articles in case of Divorce


In cases of divorce people are usually concerned what to return to the
girl and what not. According to Islamic Law and Pakistani Law two things
belong to the wife in case of divorce. One is the haq mehr which is
according to Nikahnama. The other thing are the gifts which are given to
the girl. 

Gift in Islamic Law are never taken back by the person gifting them.
According to Islam a person who takes the gift back is like a dog that
vomits and eats the vomit afterwards. So it is not reasonable for a
muslim to take the gifted items back from the girl when she is
divorced. 

Divorce is something not liked by Allah. Divorce is Halal but the most
unlikely thing in the Halal things. It is best that the husband and wife
compromise to live together once they are married unless they have no
other option then to leave each other.

If you have any query related with Divorce in Islamic Law or any other
issue related with Family laws you can contact
internationallawyerinfo@gmail.com

Regards,
Salman Yousaf Khan (Golra)
Family Lawyer
+92-333-5339880

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Proceedings before Wafaqi Mohtasib and President of Pakistan did not constitute Civil Proceedings

  PLJ 1999  Karachi  587 Present:  RAStfEED A.  RAZVI,  J.  SHIFAATULLAH QURESHI-Plaintiff Versus FEDERATION OF  PAKISTAN  through SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, 'RAILWAYS, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAILWAY BOARD), ISLAMABAD- Defendant  Suit No. 192 of 1992, decided on 20.3.1998.   Limitation Act, 1908-- —-S. 14 Arts. 56 & 115-Limitation~Question of--Plaintiff after dismissal of  his claim for recovery of amount of damage by defendant, instead of filing  suit approached  Wafaqai Mohtasib  who accepting claim of plaintiff  directed defendant to pay amount of damage to plaintiff-President of  Pakistan, on appeal, set aside order of  Wafaqi Mohtasib-Plaintiff  filed  suit for damages and permanent injunction after about 3 years and 10  months from dismissal of his claim by defendants-Plaintiff claimed that  period spent in proceeding before  Wafaqi Mohtasib  should have been  excluded-Held :~Period consumed during proceedings before  Wafaqi  Mohtasib  or before President of Pakistan could not be

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 316

PLJ 2018  Islamabad  316 Present :  Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, J. Mulana  ALLAH WASAYA and others--Petitioners versus FEDERATION OF  PAKISTAN  through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice etc.--Respondents W.P. Nos. 3862, 3847, 3896 and 4093 of 2017, heard on 9.3.2018. Constitution of  Pakistan , 1973-- ----Art. 199--Election Act, 2017, Scope-- General Election Order, 2002, Ss. 7(b) & 7(c)--Constitutional petition--Amendment in Election Act, 2017 relating to Qadiani group--Restriction on posting of Qadiani group for Constitutional posts--Contentions--Conversation of religion from Islam to Qadianiat--Separate data of NADRA relating to Qadiani in civil service--Inquiry report--Rabwa administration--Aqida-e-Khatm-e-Nubawat--Necessary measures for revival of all previous provisions relating to Qadiani group/Lahori group--Qadiani, seeks record of individuals/officers belonging to Qadiani, omitting provision of Ss. 7(b) and 7(c) of conduct of General Election Order, 2002, dec

Appointment and Recruitment in a Public Sector Company

  PLJ 2017 Islamabad 101 Present :  Shaukat  Aziz  Siddiqui , J. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION (PIAC)--Petitioner versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 2808 of 2013, decided on 18.11.2016. Wafaqi   Mohtasib  (Ombudsman) Order, 1983-- ----Arts. 9 & 29--General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 24-A--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 199--Constitutional petition--Mal-administration--Order of ombudsman--Post of management trainee officer--Recruitment--Offer letters were issued--No vested right for appointment   in   service--Provincial   quota--Jurisdiction--Question   of--Whether ombudsman while recording findings fell in error or not--Determination--Ombudsman could have exercised jurisdiction, if any allegation of mal-administration was made; therefore, complainant should have been rejected on that score alone--President issued direction to accommodate complainant in next available training--Decision on representation is not based on finding of mal-administr